Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: answer interrogatories in H.S Srinivas Prasad vs Chairman, The Institution Of Engineers on 23 July, 2015Matching Fragments
Heard the petitioner, who is present is person and learned counsel for the respondent.
2. Application had been filed under Order 11 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC by this petitioner in O.S.1566/2008 pending on the file 5th Addl. First Civil Judge, Mysuru. The said application has been dismissed after contest by the Trial Court vide order dated 4.4.2015. It is this order which is called in question on various grounds.
3. On suggesting to the petitioner, who is present in person that his purpose would be served by requesting the Trial Court to direct the defendant to produce documents and thereafter to cross examine the defendant and their witnesses. He has fairly submitted that he would do so. Any answering interrogatories is not the solution in a case like this.