Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: sheelvant in M/S Shree Renuka Sugars Limited vs M/S India Sugars And Refineries Limited on 18 July, 2013Matching Fragments
Return L.C.R., along with copy of this order to the Trial Court forthwith."
2. I have heard Sri S.S.Naganand and Sri K.M.Nataraj, learned senior counsel and Sri Veeresh R.Budihal, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri Ravi B.Naik, learned senior counsel and Sri V.M.Sheelvant, learned counsel for respondent.
3. The genesis of these revision petitions is the complaints filed by M/s.India Sugars & Refineries Ltd. The common complaints were filed against instant petitioners alleging contravention of clause (6) of Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.
11. Sri Ravi B.Naik, learned senior counsel and Sri V.M.Sheelvant, learned counsel for respondent would submit that petitioners have no locus standi to maintain revision petitions. The petitioners so far, have not been summoned to appear before the trial court.
12. The learned senior counsel for respondent would submit that averments of complaints, sworn statements and documents tendered in sworn statements accepted at their face value would constitute offences alleged against petitioners.