Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: fiitjee in Manish Anand vs Fiitjee Ltd on 21 February, 2018Matching Fragments
1. These petitions under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') have been filed by the petitioner challenging the appointment of the Arbitrator by the respondent unilaterally.
ARB.P. Nos.654-659/2017 & 814/2017 Page 1
2. The Arbitration Agreement between the parties is contained in Clause 21(a) of the "Supplementary Rules for the Employees of Fiitjee", which is reproduced herein under:-
"21(a) All disputes and differences of any nature with regard to FIITJEE service manual and the interpretation & adjudication of clauses and claims respectively shall be referred to the Sole Arbitrator appointed by the company i.e. FIITJEE. The arbitration proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 and statutory modifications thereof and rules made thereunder. The award of Arbitrator shall be final and binding on both the parties. The award of the Arbitrator shall be final and binding on every matter arising hereunder. It is further agreed that in spite of the fact that the Sole Arbitrator may be known to any of the Directors or shareholders and that he may have been dealing with the company or had occasion to deal with any matter of this agreement shall not disqualify him. Even if the Arbitrator may have expressed opinion in similar matter earlier shall also not render him disqualified. The venue of the arbitration shall be Delhi / New Delhi only."