Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: computer forensics in State Through Reference vs Ram Singh & Ors. on 13 March, 2014Matching Fragments
At this stage the CD Ex. P-67/2 is also run in the court room on the laptop and it is also shows a white colour bus on which the CRL. APP. NOS.1398/2013, 1399/2013 AND 1414/2013 word YADAV is written, moving in front of the hotel at 9.34PM and 9.53PM.‖
37. PW-76 Gautam Roy, Sr. Scientific Officer and also the Head of the Department Computer Forensic Division in CFSL, CBI corroborates the fact that on 02.01.2013 he received two sealed parcels sealed with the seal of PS and the seals tallied with the specimen seals provided. A blue coloured pen drive was found in parcel No.1, which he marked as Ex.1 and a Moserbear CD in the second parcel, which he marked as Ex.2. There was also a questionnaire with the parcels - Ex.PW-76/A. PW-76 Gautam Roy testified that he examined both the exhibits by playing them in the compuer and the bus was seen twice, at 9:34 PM and 9:54 PM. The bus shown in the exhibits had the word „Yadav‟ written on its body and front wheel cover was missing and it had a dent on its rear side.
40. A look now at the CFSL report, which is marked as Ex.PW-
76/E. The opinion given by the CFSL is that there was no CRL. APP. NOS.1398/2013, 1399/2013 AND 1414/2013 tampering or editing in both the exhibits (Ex.P-67/1 and Ex.P- 67/2), and that a bus having identical patterns as the one parked in Thyagraj Stadium is seen in the CCTV footage, which includes the word „Yadav‟ written on one side, "back side dent (left)" and absence of wheel cover on the front left side. As already noted, the said report is proved by its author PW-76 Gautam Roy, Senior Scientific Officer and also Head of the Department, Computer Forensic Division in CFSL, CBI and is even otherwise per se admissible under Section 299 Cr.P.C.