Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

3. The aforesaid accused did not plead guilty to the charge and claimed trial. Though the prosecution had cited as many as 116 witnesses in the chargesheet, however, only 56 witnesses (as per Annexure A of this judgment) have been examined by Prosecution in support of the charges framed against the accused. The aforesaid witnesses have relied upon the documents mentioned against their names in Annexure A of this Judgment and were duly cross­examined by Ld. Counsel(s) for accused persons. Besides, documents as per Annexure­B to the judgment were admitted by accused persons in terms of Section 294 Cr.P.C vide statement dated 28.08.2020.

56 PW­56 Inspector Lokender, SIU­I, Ex.PW­56/A­ questionnaire served Crime Branch, Daryaganj, Kotwali, upon the accused Abdullah. Delhi.

­Interrogated few accused at hospital/quarantine centre and seized their passports at the instance of IO.

State Vs. Abdul Koffa Te Ali FIR No. 63/2020 P.S. Crime Branch ANNEXURE­B Documents admitted by Accused Persons in terms of Section 294 Cr.P.C. 

S. No. Documents                                               Exhibit
1       Registration of FIR No. 63/2020                                Ex.A1
2       Certificate under Section 65 B of Indian Evidence Act.         Ex.A2
3       Order No. 40­3/2020­DM­I(A) dated 24.03.2020                   Ex.A3
4       Letter No. 11011/15/2020­ MHA dated 28.03.2020                 Ex.A4
5       Order dated 02.04.2020 issued by PIB, Government of India      Ex.A5
6       DGHS letter no. 105/DGHS/PHQ­IV/Covid ­19/2020/2847­ Ex.A6
        49 dated 14.05.2020
7       DGHS letter no. 105/DGHS/PHQ­IV/Covid ­19/2020/2569­ Ex.A7
        71 dated 04.05.2020
8       Letter No. S.O/Misc/DWB/2020/0486 dated 16.04.2020             Ex.A8
9       Letter No. 2/SIC/2020/(1)II­1132 dated 16.04.2020              Ex.A9
10      Letter No. 25/Imm­I/2020(1)/109 dated 04.04.2020               Ex.A10
11      Letter No. F.11/75/2019/H&FW/HR­Medical/CD dated Ex.A11