Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY in K.Kesavan ... Revision vs Savariyar on 18 February, 2020Matching Fragments
7.The appeal in C.A.No.32 of 2010 that was filed by the accused was dismissed by the District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvarur, on 25.10.2013.
8.Challenging the concurrent findings of the two Courts below, the accused has filed the present Criminal Revision Case, before this Court, under Section 397 r/w. 401 Cr.P.C.
9.Heard Mr.Swami Subramanian, learned counsel for the accused and Mr.G.Vinodh Kumar, learned counsel for the complainant. http://www.judis.nic.in
11.Mr.Swami Subramanian, learned counsel for the accused, submitted that the accused has discharged the burden under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by examining himself as a defence witness and proved the circumstances under which the impugned cheque (Ex.P1) came into the possession of the complainant. He further contended that the accused has not signed the impugned cheque (Ex.P1) and it was forged by the complainant.