Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Rukhmani Bai Ratrey vs Jagat Ram Naik on 3 February, 2025

Author: Pankaj Mithal

Bench: Pankaj Mithal

                                                            1
                                                                                    Diary No. 51391/2024



     ITEM NO.11                                  COURT NO.15                        SECTION IV-C

                                  S U P R E M E C O U R T O F               I N D I A
                                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)……………………………. Diary No. 51391/2024

     [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-09-2023
     in MAC No. 1042/2015 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at
     Bilaspur]

     RUKHMANI BAI RATREY & ANR.                                                     Petitioner(s)

                                                        VERSUS

     JAGAT RAM NAIK & ORS.                                                          Respondent(s)

     (IA No. 25825/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
     IA No. 25826/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING /                               CURING THE
     DEFECTS)

     Date : 03-02-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI

     For Petitioner(s)                  Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, AOR

     For Respondent(s)

                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

1. The delay of 321 days in filing and 49 days in refiling the present petition are adequately explained and are condoned. Accordingly, I.A. Nos. 25825/2025 and 25826/2025 are allowed.

2. Having heard learned counsel for the Signature Not Verified petitioners, we are not satisfied that it is a fit Digitally signed by SNEHA DAS Date: 2025.02.03 17:25:55 IST Reason: case to exercise our discretion under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.

3. The present petition is, accordingly, 2 Diary No. 51391/2024 dismissed.

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

     (SNEHA DAS)                            (RAM SUBHAG SINGH)
SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT                   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR