Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

This is a batch of 18 Civil Miscellaneous Appeals (CMAs) and 32 Miscellaneous Petitions for condonation of delay in filing CMAs. The issue that arises for consideration in both the appeals as well as the CMPs and the arguments that have been putforth are common. Hence, a consolidated order is passed disposing the batch.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA(MD).Nos.104 of 2019 & batch

C.M.A. Place of lands Land Number and Number and No. acquired Acquisition Date of Date of order Officer who award by the in Arbitration passed the Competent Original award Authority Petition https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA(MD).Nos.104 of 2019 & batch 912 of Thanichiyam Competent ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.76 2019 Village, Authority and 9166 of 2006 of 2013 T.Vadipatti District Taluk, Madurai Revenue 30.07.2007 Dated District Officer, 29.03.2019 Madurai Principal District Judge, Madurai 839 of Kulasekarankott Competent ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.43 2019 ai Village Authority and B10/111595/ of 2014 Vadipatti Taluk, District 2005 Madurai District Revenue Dated Officer, 04.06.2007 11.02.2019 Madurai Principal District Judge, Madurai 535 of Kulasekarankott Competent ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.37 2020 ai Village Authority and B10/111595/ of 2014 T.Vadipatti District 2005 Taluk, Madurai Revenue Dated District Officer, 04.06.2007 30.08.2019 Madurai Principal District Judge, Madurai 566 of Kulasekarankott Competent ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.61 2020 ai Village Authority and B10/111595/ of 2014 T.Vadipatti District 2005 Taluk, Madurai Revenue Dated District Officer, 04.06.2007 30.08.2019 Madurai Principal District Judge, Madurai 104 of Thathampatti Competent ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.3 2019 Village, Authority and B10/111594/ of 2013 Vadipatti Taluk, District 2005 Madurai District Revenue Dated Officer, 14.05.2007 17.09.2018 Madurai Principal District Judge, Madurai https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA(MD).Nos.104 of 2019 & batch 916 of Kulasekarankott Competent ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.46 2019 ai Village Authority and B10/111595/ of 2014 T.Vadipatti District 2005 Taluk, Madurai Revenue Dated District Officer, 04.06.2007 02.01.2019 Madurai Principal District Judge, Madurai 442 of Thuvariman Special ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.47 2020 Village Madurai District B9/114810/2 of 2013 South Taluk, Revenue 004 Madurai District Officer (LA) Dated National 26.03.2007 30.08.2019 Highways -7, Virudhunagar Principal District Judge, Madurai 437 of Thuvariman Special ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.45 2020 Village Madurai District B9/114810/2 of 2013 South Taluk, Revenue 004 Madurai District Officer (LA) Dated National 26.03.2007 30.08.2019 Highways -7, Virudhunagar Principal District Judge, Madurai 399 of Pallakkapudupatt Special ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.68 2020 i Village District B10/102388/ of 2013 Thirumangalam Revenue 04 Taluk, Madurai Officer (LA) Dated District National 12.01.2007 13.12.2019 Highways, Virudhunagar Principal District Judge, Madurai 538 of Thuvariman Special ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.49 2020 Village Madurai District B9/114810/2 of 2013 South Taluk, Revenue 004 Madurai District Officer (LA) Dated National 26.03.2007 22.08.2019 Highways -7, Virudhunagar Principal District Judge, Madurai https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA(MD).Nos.104 of 2019 & batch 515 of Melmangalam Special ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.1 2017 Village District A.P.No. of 2015 Periyakulam Revenue 38/2015/ Taluk, Theni Officer/Compe Theni/NH-45 Dated District tent Authority E & 220/ 22.12.2016 for Land Unit 1 Acquisition Principal (National 19.03.2015 District & Highways – Sessions 45E and 220), Judge, Theni Theni 863 of Devathana patty Special ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.15 2023 Village District A.P.No. of 2016 Periyakulam Revenue 9/2016/ Taluk, Theni Officer/Compe Theni/NH-45 Dated District tent Authority E & 220/ 19.06.2018 for Land Unit 1 Acquisition Principal (National 21.03.2016 District & Highways – Sessions 45E and 220), Judge, Theni Theni 864 of Devathana patty Special ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.4 2023 Village District A.P.No. of 2016 Periyakulam Revenue 131/2015/ Taluk, Theni Officer/Compe Theni/NH-45 Dated District tent Authority E & 220/ 25.02.2019 for Land Unit 1 Acquisition Principal (National 11.08.2015 District & Highways – Sessions 45E and 220), Judge, Theni Theni 444 of Veerapandi Comptent ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.29 2023 Village Theni Authority and 42/2010/ of 2015 Taluk, Theni District spl.tahr/LA District Revenue Award No. Dated Officer, Theni 10/ 2011 22.03.2018 Veera pandi Village Principal 12.01.2012 District & Sessions Judge, Theni https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA(MD).Nos.104 of 2019 & batch 554 of Veerapandi Comptent ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.33 2023 Village Theni Authority and 42/2010/ of 2015 Taluk, Theni District spl.tahr/LA District Revenue Award No. Dated Officer, Theni 10/ 2011 20.03.2019 Veera pandi Village Principal 12.01.2012 District & Sessions Judge, Theni 553 of Veerapandi Comptent ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.27 2023 Village Theni Authority and 42/2010/ of 2015 Taluk, Theni District spl.tahr/LA District Revenue Award No. Dated Officer, Theni 10/ 2011 28.08.2018 Veera pandi Village Principal 12.01.2012 District & Sessions Judge, Theni 447 of Chinnamanur Comptent ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.8 2023 Township, Authority and 50/2010/ of 2016 Palayam Taluk, Special spl.DRO/ Theni District District LA-NH Dated Revenue Award No. 29.01.2019 Officer, (LA- 220/ 2010 – NH), Theni Chinnamanur Principal Village District & 03.09.2013 Sessions Judge, Theni 570 of Veerapandi Comptent ROC No. Arb.O.P.no.25 2023 Village Theni Authority and 42/2010/ of 2015 Taluk, Theni District spl.tahr/LA District Revenue Award No. Dated Officer, Theni 10/ 2011 12.07.2016 Veera pandi Village Principal 12.01.2012 District & Sessions Judge, Theni

58. The Court also held that different yardsticks could not be taken as far as Government was concerned in matters relating to condonation of delay and those yardsticks that were applied in litigation involving private individuals would apply for the Government also. This then is the position of law that would have to be applied in deciding the present petitions.

59. In the present cases, the affidavit filed in support of the petitions seeking condonation are wholly bereft of any facts relevant to the causation of the delay. In all cases,the reason cited is the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Hakeem’s case. Several appeals have earlier been dismissed at the stage of delay condonation holding that this was insufficient as a justification. (See order in CMP (MD) No.10662 of 2019 in CMA(MD) SR No.76557 of 2019 dated 01.03.2022 and CMP (MD) Nos.1827 to 1830 and 1832 of 2023 in CMA(MD) SR.Nos.66398, 66400, 66401, 66402 and 66399 of 2022 dated 06.06.2023).

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA(MD).Nos.104 of 2019 & batch DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.

AND R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

sl CMA(MD)Nos.104, 839, 912 & 12274 of 2019 & 437, 399, 442, 535, 538 & 566 of 2020 & 515 of 2017 & 515, 444, 447, 554 & 553 of 2023 &CMP(MD)Nos.9277, 11633, 10460, 1936, 1941, 1937, 2274, 1939, 8197, 8501, 8511, 8675, 8728, 9011, 9243, 9736, 9738, 10323, 11247, 11257, 11272, 11250, 11295, 11275, 11258, 12285, 863, 864, 11980, 12283, 11263, 11317,11631, 11632, 7200, 570, 5588, 5607, 7415 & 7201 of 2023 & 4883, 5155, 5162, 5562, 5624 & 5892 of 2020 in CMA(MD) Sr.Nos.21734, 21737, 16272, 21736, 2020, 2023, 2021, 2024, 21735, 21727, 30707, 30708, 15336, 25398, 25396, 21733, 25395, 35578, 35577, 25397, 25401, 25402, 21732, 21729 & 21726 of 2023 & 66748, 66751, 66749, 81482, 66750 of 2022 08.02.2024 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis