Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: parole+tada in Manik Ananta Patil vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 5 May, 2017Matching Fragments
4. The application of the petitioner for parole came to be rejected on the ground that in view of the Notification dated 26.8.2016, the persons who are convicted under TADA Act, cannot be released on parole. It is noticed that in the petition in paragraph 4, it is specifically stated that that the petitioner applied for parole leave on 10.8.2016. Thus, this notification would not apply retrospectively.
5. Learned APP submitted that in fact on 10.8.2016, the petitioner preferred an application that he may be granted permission to be released on parole and thereafter, he preferred his application for parole on 26.8.2016, hence, on 26.8.2016, in view of the notification, he cannot be released on parole as he has been convicted under TADA.