Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: VPF in Sureshchandra Sanjulal Pandya vs State Of Gujarat & 4 on 15 June, 2016Matching Fragments
3 The State Government has filed an affidavit-in-reply, duly affirmed by the Deputy Secretary, Panchayat Rural Housing and Rural Development Department, inter alia, stating as under;
"3. With reference to para 2, I say that the petitioner was not appointed as an Octroi Clerk as per Nasawadi Gram Panchayat Resolution No. 48 dated 6.3.1962. I say that the power to appoint Octroi Inspector, Naka Karkun, Sipai ect. Is on temporary basis. Out of these posts, the posts of four Naka Karkun and one Peon were sanctioned by the Collector's office vide its order No. VPF/4/8/62 dated 5.5.1962. I respectfully submit that on perusing the same, it is not clear that the Petitioner was appointed as Octroi Clerk and I put the petition on strict proof at evidence regarding his appointment as Naka Karkun.