Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: wrong injection in Dr. T.C. Barjatia vs State on 14 March, 2013Matching Fragments
8. Commandant 22nd Battalion, Central Reserve Police Force, Srinagar & Ors. Vs. Surinder Kumar [(2011) 10 SCC 244].
In rejoinder, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there was no specific charge attributed to the petitioner that he wrongly injected Fortwin and therefore on this count alone the order impugned is not sustainable. For this contention, the petitioner has also laid stress on the statement of allegations (Annex.1) for seeking redressal from this Court against the impugned order. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also emphasized that the petitioner is having unblemished service career and therefore for a minor omission on his part, such a harsh punishment of compulsory retirement from service with proportionate pension is not sustainable.