Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

8.It is represented on behalf of the Petitioner that the 4th Respondent defaulted in payment and although the Petitioner had approached the 4th Respondent to repay the amount, the 4th Respondent did not repay the amount. Moreover, all sorts of promises and assurances were made to the Petitioner and despite the same, no amount was paid by the 4th Respondent. Under these circumstances, when the Petitioner's firm was about to invoke the 'Right of Private Sale' under the Mortgage Deed, the Petitioner was shocked to find that in respect of the property at Ekkattuthangal, owned by the 4th Respondent, the First Respondent/Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Chennai, had sealed the property and had put up Notice to all the prospective Purchasers, cautioning them from dealing with the same, also that the building had deviations beyond permissible limits. Added further, the Petitioner was shocked to learn that numerous First Information Reports were Registered in the name of the 4th Respondent and his sons by numerous Vendors and Prospective flat Purchasers, relating to the Offences such as Cheating, Forgery and Land Grabbing.