Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Ipdr in Ravinder Kaur Chadha vs The State (The Govt. Of N.C.T.Of Delhi) & ... on 5 May, 2025Matching Fragments
5. In the present case, the Trial Court considered the Petitioner's application meticulously. A status report was sought from the Investigating Officer, who confirmed that Internet Protocol Detail Records (IPDR) had been obtained but could not be analysed due to non-availability of relevant account details from the Complainant. Further, Call Detail Records (CDRs) revealed that 38 calls were made from the Petitioner's mobile number (used by the Complainant) to the number of Respondent No. 2, while only 4 calls were made in return. This discrepancy was flagged by the Trial Court, which called upon the Petitioner and her counsel to provide an explanation, but none was forthcoming.