Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(ii) of Clause 10 ef Annexure§.,/,,j,fi..?,attet:hed.tQ thieuégcehemee is violative of Articlee"'1..{}, 1_.S""e'r'iej, th'e"'Ct:vnstitution of India, as contended S. The""epi§tl..i.::Vatie_n___'i?i..|_ee" the petitioner seeking voluntafi/--*'evr'e'tiiren?:t:eVnt'*--.fl.l,ls.V' rejected, as is clear from An nexueire-"h_R4~ " round that the petitioner possesseseeithg q_u.aieifica~t'iVon of M888 and Diploma in .---.Aner-e:t'i'ie,.Sl0i~0,9'/i xHtha't'Vhe is the lone active Anesthetist in eveiisfiing nine more years of service left; that hiseisja vspeieeieelist Medical Branch for which replacement yeryrvdeiifficult to get. Since, he was the oniy clector ,._e'h~a'vi-ngj expertise in the field of Anesthesia in \/ESP it :'.,:"'l'i*eeoital, it is, but natural for the respondent ?' f \ if/' ergenisetien te reject the erayer ef the petitieifiet for veiuntary retirement. The hespitei i1eeds"~._::'e.:i{';;:i_ert Anesthetists assistance every day. If not availabie, then the patients-.rancid'Hitioeiséedu'.e'nt"fy,it' hespitai suffers, Hence, this ground to conciude they-..,ot'o:.th,e v.ap;;ific.at_iorir'see-kindV voiuntary retirenientfis rejected VVV"wi_th any "rna/a fide intention.