Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

This charge sheet filed by Police Sub-Inspector, R.M.C. Yard Police Station-Bengaluru, against accused No.1 and 2 for the offences punishable under Section 370 of I.P.C, Section 3 and 14 of Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act and Section 23 and 26 of J.J. Act.

2. Initially the charge sheet is filed by showing the accused No.1 as absconding and the committal Court committed case against accused No.2-Baccha Ansari @ Bassayabhai @ Basha. Hence, this case proceeded against accused No.2 only.

3. The case of the prosecution in brief, as per the prosecution papers, is stated as follows:

3 Spl.C.C.589/2014 The accused No.1 was having Regzion Bag manufacturing unit in the name of 'Super Products' at No.4-6/36, Tumkur Road, RMC Yard, Yeswanthapura, Bengaluru and he brought Cw.2 and Cw.3-Saroj and Rustaj-who are minor boys from Nepal by influencing them to give more salary and extracting work from them under the supervision of the accused No.2 and the accused No.2 knowing fully well that Cw.2 and Cw.3 are minor forcibly extracted work from them and illegally detained them in a room without providing basic necessities to them and without payment of salary. On the basis of complaint lodged by Police Inspector-AHTU-CID Unit, Bengaluru viz., Ayesha, the Police registered the case against the accused No.1 and 2 for the offences punishable under Section 370 of I.P.C, Section 3 and 14 of Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act and Section 23 and 26 of J.J. Act.

13. Before venturing into scan the available material evidence on record, it is necessary to mention the very definition of offences under Section 370 of I.P.C, Section 3 and 14 of Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act and Section 23 and 26 of J.J. Act.

Section 370 of I.P.C defines that:

Trafficking of persons-[1] Whoever, for the purpose of exploitation,(a) recruits, (b)transports, (c)harbours,
(d)transfers, or (e) receives, a person or persons, by-

27. Point No.4:- For the above said reasons and discussions on Point No.1 to 3, I hold that the accused No.2 is entitled for an order of acquittal. Hence, in the final result, I proceed to pass the following:

21 Spl.C.C.589/2014 ORDER Acting under Section 235(1) of Cr.P.C., the accused No.2 is acquitted for the offences punishable under section 370 of IPC, Section 3 and 14 of Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act, and Section 23 and 26 of J.J. Act. His bail bond and surety bond stand cancelled.