Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

RE: THE FIRST CONTEMPT MOTION, NM 193

9. I do not believe it is necessary to deal at length with the First Contempt Motion, NM 193. It has more or less coalesced into the Second Contempt Motion, NM 192: both allege breach of the same ad-interim order of 15th February 2010, though at different points in time, and both seek the same reliefs in that regard. Deciding NM 192 is effectively an order on NM 193. I will refer to some of the material on affidavit in NM 193, but this is to be taken as material in support of, or against, NM 192.

RE: THE THIRD CONTEMPT MOTION, NM 191.

10. NM 191, the Third Contempt Motion, can also be quickly disposed. Its conspectus is very narrow, limited to whether Sergi's continued use of its website to display its products is contempt or an 'offer to sell'. I believe the contempt jurisdiction to be far too serious in its consequences to admit of application to something that seems 28th June 2016 NMS 191192-193-665 SERGI CONTEMPT NMS.DOC to me to be utterly trivial. There is no specific order directing Sergi to take down its website. Annexed to the Affidavit in Reply are copies of some screenshots or web pages.