Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: unborn in Priyesh Vasudevan vs Shameena P on 16 November, 2005Matching Fragments
........L.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......J .SP 2 Rule 51B was inserted by S.R.O.484/90 published on 30.3.1990.
5. The word `minor' is not defined in the Scheme. The Kerala Education Act and Rules also do not define `minor'. Therefore, we have to take the aid of other statutes to find out whether a minor includes "en ventre sa mere (in its mother's womb - a term descriptive of an unborn child)."
10. Section 13 and 20 of the Transfer of Property Act deal with situations in which on a transfer of property, an interest therein is created for the benefit of a person not in existence. As per Section 20, where on a transfer of property an interest therein is created for an unborn person, he acquires on his birth, a vested interest.
11. Sections 312 to 316 of the Indian Penal Code provide for punishment for the offence of miscarriage; for doing any act with intent to prevent child being born alive; for causing death of quick unborn child by act amounting to culpable homicide etc.
18. Black's Law Dictionary refers to "rights of unborn child", thus: "The rights of an unborn child are recognised in various different legal contexts; e.g. in criminal law, murder includes the unlawful killing of a fetus (Cal. Penal Code S.187), and the law of property considers the unborn child in being for all purposes which are to its benefit, such as taking by will or descent. After its birth, it has been held that it may maintain a statutory action for the wrongful death of the parent. In addition, the child, if born alive, is permitted to maintain an action for the consequences of prenatal injuries, and if he dies of such injuries after birth, an action will lie for his wrongful death. While certain States have allowed recovery even though the injury occurred during the early weeks of pregnancy, when the child was neither viable nor quick, Sinkler v. Kneale, 401 Pa.267, 167 A.2d.93; Smith v. Brennan, 31 N.J.353, 157 A.2d.497, other States require that the foetus be viable before a civil damage action can be brought on behalf of the unborn child."
19. The legal status of unborn persons is discussed in Salmond on Jurisprudence, 11th Edition, at pages 354 and 355, the relevant portion of which reads as follows:
...............L.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.J ...............L.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.J .SP 1 "Though the dead possess no legal personality, it is otherwise with the unborn. There is nothing in law to prevent a man from owning property before he is born. His ownership is necessarily contingent, indeed, for he may never be born at all; but it is none the less a real and present ownership. ......