Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: parat sarkar in Mahinder Singh vs State Of Haryana on 29 January, 2013Matching Fragments
The record was seen, which reflected the pedigree table. There was no signatures whereas Parat Patwar and Parat Sarkar mutation No.34 and 35, signatures of Jeet Singh, Lambardar, were available. Mutation No.34 was in the name of concubine of Nawab, namely, Hafiza Begum and her son. The enquiry further revealed that on this document, Jeet Singh, Lambardar, had put his signatures, which were found to be forged. These signatures were got compared and were found to be so forged. Jeet Singh, Lambardar, made statement on 2.5.2006 before Consolidation Officer, Karnal, that he had neither signed this mutation nor he was known to Jamshed Ali Khan or Hafiza Begum etc. The Lambardar further stated that ancestors of harijans and now complainant, harijans, were cultivating the land for the last 100 years. Nawab had never cultivated this land. The mutation No.34 dated 15.4.1993 with respect to the land measuring 5539.05 bighas was entered and sanctioned by Kishori Lal, on the asking of Sh.Mahinder Singh (petitioner) the then Assistant CRIMINAL MISC. M NO.28707 OF 2012 :{ 5 }: