Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: parole system in Surendra Kumar vs State on 26 August, 2020Matching Fragments
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KUMARI PRABHA SHARMA Judgment 26/08/2020 Heard. Perused the material available on record. The convict-petitioner has filed the instant parole writ petition seeking to assail the adverse recommendations drawn up in the meeting of the District Parole Advisory Committee, Sikar held on 03.07.2020 whereby the petitioner's application for first parole of twenty days has been rejected. The Committee rejected the application of the petitioner on the ground that as per the report of the District Superintendent of Police Sikar, the convict- petitioner has been convicted in a murder case and if he is released on parole, the society will loose its faith towards the legal (2 of 3) [CRLW-292/2020] system and that the victim party might feel offended by the convict's release on parole. It is pertinent to note here that contrary to the police report, the Social Justice and Empowerment Department, Sikar has submitted a report to the effect that if the convict-petitioner is released on parole, no adverse affect shall be caused to the peace and tranquility of the society.