Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Appearance Ms. D.M. Durando, Dy. Commr. (A.R.) : For Appellant Ms. Padmavati Patil, Advocate : For Respondents CORAM:

Honble Shri P.R. Chandrasekharan, Member (Technical) Date of Hearing :
20.04.2012 Date of Decision:
20.04.2012 ORDER NO. ............................................

Per: P.R. Chandrasekharan There are four appeals along with stay applications and condonation of delay applications filed by M/s. Lupin Ltd., against order-in-appeal No SB/20-25/LTU/MUM/2009 dated 30.11.2009 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) of Central Excise and Service Tax, LTU, Mumbai. Against the said order they have filed a composite appeal within the time and, therefore, they were directed to file separate appeals on account of which there was a delay of 59 days in filing the appeals. Considering the reason for delay is satisfactory, I allow the applications for condonation of delay in filing the appeals.

9. In view of the above, I allow the appeals filed by M/s. Lupin Ltd and dismiss the appeals filed by the Revenue.


				   (Dictated in Court)

				        			                  	                     (P.R. Chandrasekharan)				Member (Technical)


nsk