Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

2. Thereafter, the landlord/ decree-holder put the decree in execution in 1987. The execution application was registered as Ejectment Execution Case No. 293 of 1987.

3. Suddenly, in 1989, one Sudhir Kumar Bose, claiming himself to be the cousin of the original tenant, instituted a suit vide Title Suit No. 442 of 1989, seeking a declaration that the judgment and decree passed in the ejectment suit on 19.12.1981 is not binding upon him, as he was a pre-Act sub-tenant under Mahitosh Bose. Additionally, he prayed for a decree of permanent injunction restraining the landlord/decree holder from executing the decree passed in Title Suit No. 892 of 1969. In the schedule appended to the plaint of Title Suit No. 442 of 1989, only one room on the first floor with an attached verandah at the premises No. 72/1, Manicktala Street, P.S. Amherst Street, Calcutta-9, was mentioned as suit premises.