Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

5. The case of the second respondent is that appellants had no semblance of right in the temple property and they come forward with a suit on the basis of manipulated and created documents purposefully. They clubbed the temple property with the property in the SF.No.511. The properties in SF.Nos.84 to 92 to an extent of 32.91acres of othakalmandapam village were granted to the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis temple as Devadayam Inam lands. Patta was granted in favour of the temple in respect of these lands. This temple is in possession in respect of 2.85acres in SF.No.90 as absolute owner. This property is not a common road or pathway.