Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: bc priority in R. Ravichandran vs The Director Of Medical And Rural Health ... on 19 March, 2024Matching Fragments
4. Infact, in O.A.No.3399 of 2001, the respondents filed their counter affidavits. The respondents without waiting for the outcome of the case, he was terminated for hypothetical reasons. Aggrieved by the action of the respondents in terminating the service of the petitioner, the present writ petition has been filed.
5. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the second respondent. It is averred in the counter affidavit that the petitioner was appointed under the BC Non Priority. Though one Thiru. N. Rethinasamy who was senior under Employment Exchange seniority to the petitioner and by overlooking his seniors, he was appointed irregularly. Accordingly, the petitioner was terminated from service vide proceedings dated 18.05.2001 without giving a notice and reasons as already informed in his appointment order. It is stated in the counter affidavit that against the termination https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis order, the petitioner filed O.A.No.3399 of 2001 in the erstwhile Tamilnadu Administrative Tribunal, Channai and got interim stay orders on 22.05.2001 and 21.06.2001. In the light of the interim stay orders of Tamilnadu Administrative Tribunal, the petitioner rejoined duty in the month of May 2001 and continuing the service till date.