Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(i) Whether the prosecution through the testimonies of witnesses, exhibits and material objects marked, is able to prove it's case beyond reasonable doubt?
(ii) Whether the appellant/accused is entitled to the benefit under Section 84 I.P.C?

http://www.judis.nic.in Question Nos.(i) & (ii):

7. Since the learned Counsel for the appellant/accused has restricted his submissions only to the extent that the appellant/accused is entitled to the benefit of Section 84 I.P.C., we deem it appropriate to consider the said issue alone in the light of the oral and documentary evidence let in by the prosecution.

“84. Act of a person of unsound mind.- Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who, at the time of doing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law.”

14. From perusal of the above quoted provisions of law it appears that to bring a crime under the exception of Section 84 I.P.C., the following essential ingredients, of Section 84 I.P.C. are to be fulfilled:

14. Thus, it is crystal clear that to bring a crime under the exception of Section 84 I.P.C., the essential ingredients of Section 84 I.P.C. to be fulfilled, are (a) The act must be done by a person who is incapable of knowing; (i) The nature of the act, or (ii) That what he is doing is either wrong or contrary to law; (b) Such incapacity must arise by reason of unsoundness of mind and (c) Such incapacity must exist at the time of doing the act.

http://www.judis.nic.in

26. Keeping in mind the principles laid down in the aforesaid decisions and on analysis of the materials available on record, we are of the considered opinion that in the case on hand, the appellant/accused has proved the existence of circumstances bringing his case within the purview of Section 84 I.P.C, through the testimonies of D.W.1 and C.W.1 and also the treatment chart marked as Ex.D.1 on the side of the defence. Moreover, the evidence adduced on the side of the appellant/accused and the materials available on the side of the prosecution would clearly establish the fact that the appellant/accused has been suffering from schizophrenia at the relevant point of time and he was not capable of understanding the nature of the act or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law and hence, he is entitled to the benefit of Section 84 I.P.C.