Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: tasmac tender in P. Selvam vs The Managing Director on 7 January, 2016Matching Fragments
The Petitioners have filed these writ petitions challenging the impugned orders dated 28.11.2015 passed by the 2nd respondent and consequently seeking a direction to the respondents to accept the security deposit amounts that had already been deposited by the petitioners within the time limit framed by this Court.
2. Heard M/s.D.Saraswathi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.B. Nedunchezhian, learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondent/ TASMAC.
3. It is the case of the petitioners that for the purpose of running bars attached to the TASMAC shops, the 2nd respondent called for tenders. Accordingly, the petitioners participated in the same and were declared as successful bidders. Subsequently, on payment of security deposits fixed by the 2nd respondent and one month rental amount in advance, they were granted licence for the period 2014-2015.