Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

9. The alleged rent note has been executed not by the lessor Chunilal but by Parvatibai. There are several aspects of the document which merit notice. The first is the recital in the document that an amount of Rs. 16.50 was being paid to Parvatibai by Chunilal. There is absolutely no reason why any amount was being paid to Parvatibai if she was taking the premises on rent. The original document which is in the 'Modi' script is a part of the record and proceedings. The document has been translated. Surprisingly in the translation itself, there appears to be an overwriting. Initially it appears in the translation that what has been stated is that Parvatibai was giving the premises on rent to Chunilal. This has been overwritten to read that Parvatibai was taking the premises on rent. The overwriting is quite clear to the naked eye.