Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: section 118 penal code in Thankamma Nelliyaniyil vs State Of Kerala on 14 March, 2017Matching Fragments
8. The sum and substance of the allegations against the petitioners is that even though the petitioners got information regarding the delivery of the victim on 7.2.2017, they caused long delay in reporting the matter to the police. Even though so many offences are alleged against the first accused in this case, the offences alleged against the petitioners herein are the offences under Sections 370, 201, 166(A), 118, 119, 506(1) and 120B read with Section 34 I.P.C., Sections 16, 17 and 19(1) read with Section 21(1) B.A.1667/2017 & cnnctd cases of the POCSO Act and section 32(1) read with Sections 34, 75 and 80 of the Act. The offences under sections 376(2)
B.A.1667/2017 & cnnctd cases
10. The offences under Sections 118 and 119 I.P.C. are not attracted in this case, as there is no allegation or material to indicate primafacie that the petitioners had concealed the design to commit the offence of rape by the first accused. Sections 16 and 17 of the POCSO Act are also not attracted against the petitioners herein as there is no allegation that the petitioners abettted the commission of the offence of rape by the first accused. The offences under Sections 166A, 201 and 506(1) I.P.C. are bailable offences.