Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: documents notarized in Ram Pratap vs Purshottam@Lala Ram on 17 January, 2017Matching Fragments
9.4 The suit of plaintiff is decreed against the defendant. The plaintiff is awarded the damages @ `36,000/- along with interest @ 6% p.a. on the entire sum of damages.'
8. The First Appellate Court, vide its judgment dated 19th December, 2015 reversed the judgment of the learned Trial Court observing as under:-
10. The claim of the defendant/appellant that he is occupying the premises as its owner. The learned Trial Court after appreciating the evidence as produced has not found the appellant occupying the premises as owner. The findings of the learned Trial Court are based on the evidence adduced by the parties and does not need interference. The plaintiff is claiming his ownership of the premises on the averments that he has purchased the property from Smt.Barji Devi by way of sale documents dated 24.08.1990. The plaintiff during the course of trial has filed a GPA, agreement to sell, affidavit, Will and a receipt. Out of the said documents only receipt is registered and remaining are notarized documents. In the documents it has not been disclosed how executor Smt.Barji Devi acquired rights in the suit property. The receipt is only qua receiving of a sum of `1,50,000/- and purpose has not been mentioned in the same.