Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

3 I have heard both the learned counsels for the parties and have also gone through the impugned order and the material placed on record. 4 When  the  Ld.  Counsel  for the  respondent  was  asked   about  the attraction   of   provisions   of   Section   500   IPC,   in   respect   of   the   judicial proceedings and pleadings therein, Ld. Counsel has relied upon the following citations:­

(i)   Sanjay   Mishra   v.   Govt.   of   NCT   of   Delhi,   reported   in   Indian   Kanoon­ http:indiankanoon.org/doc/62501359/;

(ii)       Bikramjit   Alhuwalia   &   Ors   v.   Simran   Ahluwalia,   reported   in   Indian Kanoon­http:indiankanoon.org/doc/80168157/; and

(iii)   Arundhati   Sapru   v.   Yash   Mehra,   reported   in   Indian   Kanoon­ http:indiankanoon.org/doc/173988137/;

CR No. 204754/16 Vinod Kumar Vs. O.P. Sisodia. Page No. 3/5

5 The factual matrix of the case revolves around of para--1 of the additional pleas taken by the petitioner herein before the Hon'ble High Court in the WS filed by him, wherein he had made the following assertions;­ "... It is stated that Mr. L K Sgar in collusion with Mr. O P Sisodia and some other members of the society wants to illegally take over the society and its   assets   for   his   own   benefit   and   has   therefore forged and fabricated the records of the society to execute his illegal and malafide intentions."