Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

14. The next allegation is that the petitioners committed offence under Section 291 IPC. It defines 'continuance of nuisance after injunction to discontinue' in the following words:-

“291.continuance of nuisance after injunction to discontinue - Whoever repeats or continues a public nuisance, having been enjoined by any public servant who has lawful authority to issue such injunction not to repeat or continue such nuisance, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both. ”
- So, the allegation mentioned in the final report will not attract any of the ingredients under Section 291 IPC.

15. A reading of the averments made in the final report also will not attract any of the ingredients mentioned in this petition. As mentioned earlier, there is no material on record to show that they assembled in the place of occurrence with an intention to create nuisance.