Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Engineering selection grade in Dr. Hari C.V vs Indian Institute Of Information ... on 10 February, 2025Matching Fragments
2. The appellant, who participated in the selection process for the post of Assistant Professor Grade-I and Assistant Professor Grade-II in the 1st respondent Institute, filed the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:
6
2025:KER:10381 "(i) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction, calling for the records leading to: Ext P1 and Exts.P4 to P7 and Exts.P8 to P11, to the extent that they apply to the selection of Assistant Professor Grade II, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, IIIT, Kottayam;
(ii) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction, quashing Ext.P1 and Exts.P4 to P7 and Exts.P8 to P11, to the extent that they apply to the selection of Assistant Professor Grade II, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, IIIT, Kottayam;
(iii) Declare that the selection and appointment of the candidates as per Ext.P7 is illegal and quash their appointments as illegal;
(iv) Issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents 2 and
13. As said above, in the affidavit filed in support of I.A. No.2 of 2024, no document or information-wise reason is stated by the appellant. The relevant portion of the affidavit reads thus:
2025:KER:10381 "1. I am the petitioner in this Writ Petition(Civil), I am swearing this affidavit on my behalf and I am conversant with the facts of the case. The Writ Petition (Civil) has been filed praying for setting aside the selection process to the post of Assistant Professor Grade II in the Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering in the 1st respondent Indian Institute of Information Technology, Kottayam (IIT, Kottayam) declaring the selection as illegal;