Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: partial compromise in Gurpinderpal Singh@Pali vs State Of Punjab And Another on 29 October, 2022Matching Fragments
A perusal of the above report would also show that in the present case, there are three accused persons, out of which, one accused person i.e. the present petitioner has filed the present petition for quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise and thus, the present case is a case of partial compromise.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the 4 of 6 petitioner was not declared proclaimed offender in the present case. Learned counsel for the State, as per instructions has stated that the said fact is correct.
With respect to the aspect of partial compromise, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jayrajsinh Digvijaysinh Rana Vs. State of Gujarat and another, reported as 2012(12) SCC 401 to contend that even in case of a partial compromise, FIR can be quashed qua the accused with whom the compromise has been effected.
Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has again reiterated that the matter has been settled and the said compromise is in the interest of all the persons and would help in bringing out peace and amity between the two parties.