Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

: In this interlocutory application, the petitioner has prayed  for   addition   of   certain   facts   and   also   intended   to   bring   some  document on record, which were not earlier incorporated in the  writ petition. 

It   has   been   submitted   that   the   amendment   prayed   for  does   not   go   to   change   the   nature   and   character   of   the   writ  petitioner   and   that   the   statements   required   to   be   brought   on  record in order to add facts, which are already on record. 

­2­ Considering   the   above,   this   interlocutory   application   is  allowed. Amendment, as prayed for, also stands allowed. 

I.A. No.2566 of 2011 is disposed of.  

(Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.) I.A. No.673 of 2011:

In this  interlocutory application, the applicant has prayed  for its addition as respondent in this writ petition. 
It has been submitted that the writ petition has been filed  against   the   order   dated   28th  January,   2011   (Annexure­13).   The  applicant has also filed a separate writ petition challenging the  said   order   and   as   such,   their   presence   in   the   writ   petition   is  necessary   for   the   purpose   of   complete   adjudication   of   the  controversies between the parties. 
Considering   the   above,   this   interlocutory   application   is  allowed. The applicant is added as respondent. 
I.A. No.673 of 2011 is disposed of. 
(Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.) W.P.(C) No.863 of 2011:
This writ petition shall be heard.  Since the respondents have appeared, no notice need be  issued. 
­3­ The   parties   are   at   liberty   to   file   their   counter   affidavit.  Liberty is also given to the parties to pray for fixing an early date  of hearing. 
10/07.12.2011: In this  interlocutory application, the applicant has prayed  for its addition as respondent in this writ petition. 
It has been submitted that the writ petition has been filed  against   the   order   dated   28th  January,   2011   (Annexure­14).   The  applicant has also filed a separate writ petition challenging the  said   order   and   as   such,   their   presence   in   the   writ   petition   is  necessary   for   the   purpose   of   complete   adjudication   of   the  controversies between the parties.