Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: telescoping in Shri Ramesh Chand Rai, Indore vs The Cit(A)-3, Bhopal, Bhopal on 18 April, 2022Matching Fragments
9c) That, without prejudice to the above and without in any manner admitting that the appellant had actually made the receipts of any income, amounting to Rs.4,25,000/- from any warehouse and as also without admitting that the appellant had actually made payment of any commission amounting to Rs.2,36,000/-, if both the receipt and payment transactions are held to be genuine, then, the learned CIT(A) grossly erred in not giving the benefit of telescoping to the appellant in respect of the alleged payment against the alleged receipts.
9b) That, without prejudice to the above and without admitting any alleged unexplained investment in the subject land and as also, without admitting any receipt of income by the appellant from any Syndicate, the learned CIT(A) grossly erred in not granting benefit of telescoping to the appellant in respect of the alleged unexplained investment against the alleged receipt of income by the appellant from various Syndicates in various years.
10 That, the appellant further craves leave to add, alter and/or amend any of the foregoing grounds of appeal as and when considered necessary."
10b) That, without prejudice to the above and without admitting any alleged unexplained investment in the subject land and as also, without admitting any receipt of income by the appellant from any Syndicate, the learned CIT(A) grossly erred in not granting benefit of telescoping to the appellant in respect of the alleged unexplained investment against the alleged receipt of income by the appellant from various Syndicates in various years.
11 That, the appellant further craves leave to add, alter and/or amend any of the foregoing grounds of appeal as and when considered necessary."
8b) That, without prejudice to the above and without admitting any alleged unexplained investment in the subject land and as also, without admitting any receipt of income by the appellant from any Syndicate, the learned CIT(A) grossly erred in not granting benefit of telescoping to the appellant in respect of the alleged unexplained investment against the alleged rental income from plying of Bolero Vehicle and as also, alleged receipt of income by the appellant from various Syndicates in various years.