Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Labour, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Cess Assessing Authority Cum Labour Officer, Under Building And Other Construction, Workers Welfare Cress Act 1996, Janjgir Distirct Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

3. Inspector, Building And Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act 1996, Janjgir, Distirct Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

---- Respondents Writ Petition (C) No. 392 of 2015 M/s Danieli India Pvt. Ltd. Registered Office At: Technopolis, Block- BP Plot- IV, 5th Floor, B Wing Sector V, Salt Lake Kolkata- 700091 Through:- Joint Managing Director, Mr. Bikramjit Ghosh, S/o Late Mr. Mohan Lal Ghosh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o. Kolkata (W.B.)

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Labour Mantralaya D K S Bhawan Raipur Chhattigarh
2. The Cess Assessing Authority Cum Assistant Labour Commissioner Building And Other Construction Worker Welfare Cess Act 1996 Korba District Korba C G
3. The Inspector Building And Other Construction Worker Welfare Cess Act 1996 Korba Distt. Korba C G
---- Respondents Writ Petition (T) No. 5261 of 2011 M/s Areva T&D India Ltd. A Company Duly Incorporated Under The Relevant Provisions Of The Companies Act, Having Its Registered Office At E - 48/7, Okhla Industrial Areva, Phase - I I New Delhi 110020

---- Petitioner Vs

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Labour, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Cess Imposing Officer-Cum-Labour Officer Under Building And Other Construction Workers (Regulation Of Employment And Conditions Of Service) Act, 1996, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

3. Inspector, Building And Other Construction Workers (Regulation Of Employment & Conditions Of Service) Act, 1996, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

"17. Keeping in view the aforesaid objective of the respective Acts, we now deal with the scope and ambit of Section 2(d) of BOCW Act. As noticed above, one of the submissions of the appellants is that literal interpretation needs to be given to the said provision as it categorically excludes those building or construction work to which Factories Act apply. In this very hue, it is argued that as the benefit under the Factories Act are already given to the construction workers who are involved in the construction work, there is no need for covering the construction workers who are engaged in building or construction work of the appellants under BOCW Act or Welfare Cess Act.