Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: reanalysis report in M/S Insecticide India Ltd And Another vs State Of Punjab on 16 November, 2011Matching Fragments
Learned counsel for the petitioners, while taking me to paragraph No.10 of the copy of the complaint (Annexure P-7), has argued that the second sample was sent for reanalysis by appellate authority; The analysis report was received on 21.2.2007 in the office of CAO, Mansa, and according to reanalysis report, sample was found according to specifications, therefore, pendency of the criminal proceedings against the petitioners amounts to abuse of process of law. Learned counsel has further argued that now case is fixed for consideration of the charges for 26.11.2011. Learned counsel, while placing reliance on the judgment of learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of M/s Jai Shree Rasayan Udyog & Anr. Vs. State of Punjab in Crl. Misc. No.33538-M of 2007 dated 3.2.2009, has argued that if second sample was found as per specifications then accused should not CRM No. M-25275 of 2011 (O&M) be asked to face the trial.