Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

6. There was Arrear Dues of Rs. 11,51,629/- assessed under Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The contention as to the existence of casual workers was not accepted by the Writ Court.

7. It was observed by the Hon'ble Single Judge that the review application under Section 7B was rejected and it was apparent on the face of the decision dated 20th April, 2001 that the petitioners admitted their liability with respect to the casual employees for whom the proceedings had been initiated under para 26B of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952.