Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: void deed in Subhash Chandra vs Vardhman Spinning And General Mills ... on 12 November, 1993Matching Fragments
3. It is the contention of the petitioner that :
(a) the company has registered the transfer in spite of intimation from the petitioner regarding change in the specimen signature well before the transfer was effected ;
(b) the transfer is void since the transfer deeds have not been duly stamped as per the Indian Stamp Act. The company has ignored the legal infirmity in the instrument of transfer and has mala fide transferred the shares in the name of R. K. Malhotra.
(c) the company's contention that the transferor has executed the transfer deed on January 23, 1990, is wrong as the petitioner has not actually executed the deed but lost the blank transfer deeds before January 23, 1990.