Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties referred as plaintiffs and defendants as arrayed in O.S.No.47 of 2012 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Periyakulam.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4. Case of the plaintiffs:

The 1st plaintiff’s father PeriyaMatran Madhari purchased the house along with 4 ½ feet width pathway from Murugandi Madhari by virtue of sale deed dated 05.11.1945 for Rs.10/-. The first plaintiff's father had been enjoying the property by constructing the house and after his death, the 1st plaintiff is residing along with his family. The plaintiffs’ house is situated on the western side. There is east-west separate pathway from the house of the plaintiffs to reach the main cement street. The defendants’ house is situated at southern side of the 4 ½ feet pathway, i.e., the pathway is the northern boundary of the defendants’ house. The pathway is shown as ABCD in the rough sketch, which is the suit property. The plaintiffs have been enjoying the suit pathway for more than 66 years as their own separate pathway. The defendants put up 3’ x 3’ x 1 ½’ cement tank and kept stones, fire sticks and pillar stones along the plaintiff’s suit pathway and thereby, obstructing the plaintiffs' enjoyment from 01.01.2012. Hence, the plaintiffs laid the suit.