Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: set forth value in Maganlal vs Chief on 15 September, 2010Matching Fragments
After appreciating submissions made by both learned advocates, relevant Sections 32(A) and 32(B) are quoted as under:-
32A.Determination of market value of property which is the subject matter of conveyance, etc. 1[(1) Every instrument of conveyance, exchange, gift, certificate of sale, partition, partnership, settlement, power of attorney to sell immovable property when given for consideration or transfer of lease by way of assignment, presented for registration under provisions of the Registration Act, 1908(XVI of 1908) shall be accompanied by a true copy thereof;2 [and the statement in such form as may be prescribed by rules] and if an officer registering such instrument under the aforesaid Act or any person referred to in section 33 before whom such instrument is produced or come in the performance of his functions, has reason to believe that the consideration set forth therein does not approximate to the market value of the property which is the subject matter of such instrument or as the case may be the market value of the property which is the subject matter of such instrument, has not been truly set forth therein, he 3[shall before] registering the instrument or, as the case may be, performing his functions in respect of such instrument, refer the instrument or true copy thereof to the Collector of such district in which either the whole or any part of the property is situated for determining the true market value of such property and the proper duty payable on the instrument under this section] 4[Provided that for the purpose of this Sub-section, the consideration set forth in an instrument executed by the State Government, the Central Government, a local authority, Gujarat Housing Board, Gujarat Slum Clearance Board or Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation, shall be deemed to be the true market value of the property which is the subject matter of such instrument.] On receipt of the instrument under Sub-section (3) of 5[section 31 or instrument or true copy of instrument under] sub-section (1) of this section, the Collector of the district shall, after giving the parties concerned a reasonable opportunity of being heard, and in accordance with the rules made by the State Government in this behalf, determine the true market value of the property which is the subject matter of the instrument and the proper duty payable thereon.
Provided that, no such party shall be required to pay any amount to make up the difference or to pay any penalty under this sub-section if the difference between the amount of the consideration or, as the case may be, the market value as set forth in the instrument and the market value as determined by the Collector of the district does not exceed ten percent, of the market value determined by the Collector of the district. This proviso deleted w.e.f.11-6-2004.(4)
The Collector of the district may, suo motu or on receipt of information from any source, within, 8[six years] from the date of registration of any instrument referred to in sub-section (1), not being the instrument upon which an endorsement has been made under section 32 or the instrument in respect of which the proper duty has been determined by him under sub-section (3) or an instrument executed before the date of the commencement of the Bombay Stamp (Gujarat Amendment Act, 1982) call for and examine the instrument for the purpose of satisfying himself as to the correctness of the consideration or of the market value of the property which is the subject matter of such instrument and the duty payable thereon; and if on such examination, he has reason to believe that the consideration does not approximate to the market value of such property or, as the case may be, market value of such property has not been truly and fully set forth in the instrument, he shall proceed as provided in sub-sections (2) and (3).