Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

The same finding has been reiterated in para 3.28 and the relevant part of the same is reproduced hereunder:

"Given the fact that there was enormity of market manipulation by Shri Ketan Parekh and his related entities in certain scrips and that Shri Ketan Parekh and his related entities could not have manipulated the market to such huge proportions alone, it stands to reason that the entities who had direct dealings with KP entities can't escape their responsibility on the plea that they were not aware of Shri Ketan Parekh's manipulative intentions in the market. There can be no direct evidence in the context of market operations as to whether there was a constructive knowledge on the part of the entities on manipulation while dealing with Shri Ketan Parekh and his entities. Proof of manipulation always is drawn from a mass of details and accordingly, it is purely inferential on the materials available in a given case."