Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

After giving information and arresting the accused public servant, we returned to the office in Nanded and since the voice sample of the accused public servant had to be recorded there, we took a new memory card and made sure that no conversation was recorded on it. We inserted that memory card into the digital voice recorder. The voice sample of the accused public servant was recorded in that digital voice recorder and at the same place the statement of the accused public servant was recorded. The copy of application for obtaining mutation bearing exhibit number 28 shown now and annexed extract of seven and eight A are the same. Accordingly, a panchnama of all incidents and a panchnama of voice samples were carried out. Thereafter, the hash value of the memory card was checked and it was found to contain eight files. The memory card was seized and deposited at Himayatnagar Police Station.

It is true to say that, Hash - value checked by me. The investigation did not found that the first demand was for a bribe of Rs. 200. It is not true to say that the amount of Rs. 120 accepted by A.P.S. was the government fees for issuing two true copies. It is not true to say that the amount accepted by A.P.S. is Rs. 120 which is the legal fee for providing the true copies. It is not true to say that a false case has been registered against A.P.S. It is not true to say that A.P.S. did not demand or accept bribes. It is not true to say that a false case has been filed against APS without any solid evidence.

It is not true to say that, the trap and complete investigation documents were not sent to the competent authority. It is true to say that there was no F.S.L. report in those documents. It is true to say that documents relevant to hash value were not sent to the competent authority. I was in possession of all the memory cards in the action. It is true to say that the memory card was removed from the sealed pocket and placed back in it after use and sealed.