Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

10. Examining the pleadings and the entire evidence on record, I find that the entire thrust of the case is that the reputation of the Chauhan family and in particular Mr Ashok Kumar Chauhan and Mr Arun Kumar Chauhan has been demeaned by the defendant. Unfortunately, the said Mr Ashok Kumar Chauhan and Mr Arun Kumar Chauhan are not the plaintiffs. The plaintiff is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. Mr Ashok Chauhan is the President of the Executive Board of the plaintiff society and the other members of the Chauhan family are also members of the Executive Board. The 7 members of the Executive Board indicated in the Memorandum of Association and Rules and Regulations of the plaintiff society (Exhibit-PW-1/2) are also founder members for life and are not liable to retire. All of them are members of the Chauhan family. The statements alleged to be of a defamatory/libelous nature which are being attributed to the defendant are allegedly those contained in the Tehelka edition of 11.06.2005 (Exhibit-PW-1/30); e-mail from the defendant to the Vice-Chancellor of the City University of London as communicated to Major General R.K. Dhawan (Exhibit-PW-1/31); news story telecast on NDTV on 11.06.2005 (Exhibit-PW-1/32) and some letters written to the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India, New Delhi. Insofar as the letters allegedly written to the HRD Ministry, New Delhi are concerned, the same are not on record and, therefore, the contents of the said letters, if indeed they were written, are unknown. Therefore, nothing turns on the purported letters allegedly written to the HRD Ministry, Government of India, New Delhi. As regards the Tehelka edition of 11.06.2005 (Exhibit-PW-1/30), the front page carries the title Germany wants Amity owners extradited for financial fraud. The article itself is at page 14 of the newspaper. On going through the article, it is abundantly clear that it is against the AMITY Directors, Ashok Kumar Chauhan and Arun Kumar Chauhan and the only reference to the plaintiff society in the said article is in the following words: