Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Traffic apprentice in Rajesh Kumar vs M/O Railways on 13 October, 2025Matching Fragments
II.
Direct the respondents to consider and appoint the applicant to the post of Traffic Apprentice & Goods Guard in Pay Band 9300-34800 KAMLA DEVI with Grade pay of Rs. 4200/- with all the KAMLA DEVI consequential benefits.
2025.10.17 12:31:27+05'30'
2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that respondent No.2 issued Notice dated 12.05.2012 inviting applications for filling of number of posts including the post of Traffic Apprentice & Goods Guard in Pay Band 9300-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- with closing date by 11.06.2012 upto 17:30 hrs for different categories. The applicant being fully eligible as per the criteria laid down in the advertisement applied for the post of Traffic Apprentice & Good Guard. Written examination was held on 02.12.2012 at Jaipur and applicant was declared pass and was subjected to second written examination which was held at Ajmer on 18.08.2013. Thereafter, the respondents declared the final result vide order dated 12.08.2014, wherein name of the applicant was included in the list of selected candidates. Selected candidates were called in the office of R.R.B. Ajmer on 09.09.2014 for documents verification. The applicant appeared on that date. However, when the final result was issued on 21.10.2014, name of the applicant was not included therein. So the applicant immediately approached the respondents but to no avail. In the meantime the applicant also cleared the selection process for the post of Khalasi in Railway and was appointed on the said post on 09.10.2014.
KAMLA DEVI KAMLA DEVI2025.10.17 12:31:27+05'30'
3. When he was not informed about his result regarding post of Traffic Apprentice and Goods Guard, he approached the Principal Bench of the Tribunal by filing O.A. No.4251/2015 which was disposed of vide order dated 20.11.2015, with a liberty to the applicant to make representation for redressal of his grievance to the concerned authority within a period of two weeks which was to be decided by the respondents within six weeks thereafter. The applicant submitted representation on 09.12.2015, which was rejected by the respondents vide impugned order dated 25.01.2016 (Annexure A-8) on two grounds one that the applicant failed to provide the date of purchase of IPO and second NOC from the present department of the applicant, so the candidature of the applicant was rejected.
4. The applicant approached the Principal Bench of the Tribunal by filing O.A. No.7221/2016 titled as Rajesh Kumar versus U.O.I. and Anr. Challenging the order dated 21.10.2014 and dated 25.01.2016 declaring him ineligible for appointment to the post of Traffic Apprentice. Thereafter, the applicant also filed P.T. No.100/211/2016 before the Hon'ble Chairman for retention of O.A. before Principal Bench, which was rejected and the O.A. was Transferred to this Tribunal vide order dated 16.09.2016.
11. We find that the applicant has succeeded in the examination for the post of Traffic Apprentice & Goods Guard, conducted by the Railway Recruitment Board. However, since result was declared late, in the meantime he joined after clearing the selection process, the post of Railway Khalasi, on 09.10.2014 i.e. before the final result was issued on 21.10.2014 (Annexure A-4) for the post of Traffic Apprentice & Goods Guard. As per the direction of Principal Bench dated KAMLA DEVI KAMLA DEVI2025.10.17 12:31:27+05'30' 20.11.2015, the applicant made representation on 09.12.2015 to the respondents, which was rejected vide order dated 21.05.2016 (Annexure A-9). The aforesaid representation was rejected on two grounds that during document verification on 09.09.2014, applicant had not produced any date regarding purchase of IPO on 12.05.2012 and he failed to produce NOC from office of General Manager, Ferozepur. Due to these reasons, Railway recruitment Board, Ajmer cancelled his candidature on 25.01.2016 (Annexure A-