Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Promissory note forgery in Darshan Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 26 May, 2011Matching Fragments
3. The Financial Commissioner has taken into account the fact that the petitioner-Darshan Singh was involved in two criminal cases namely FIR No. 85 dated 21.07.1999 under Section 409/341 IPC, P.S. Mahilpur in regard to which he remained in jail and case FIR No. 23 dated 15.02.2007 in regard to forgery of documents, promissory notes, agreement, death certificate and usurping the land.
4. Respondent no. 4-Kewal Singh, in his reply filed in Court, has detailed the pendency of cases in para no. 1 of the preliminary objections. It has been indicated that the subject matter of FIR No. 23 is fabrication of 7 documents and, therefore, involvement of the petitioner is made out for commission of offences under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 420 and 120-B IPC. It has also been brought out that proceedings under Section 195/340 Cr.P.C. have also been initiated for furnishing false documents.