Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: IEDSS in Association Of B.T And Pgt Iedss Special ... vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 16 April, 2024Matching Fragments
The present writ petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents No.2 to 17 from filling of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis the vacant post of Graduate Teachers “IEDSS” by way of promotion to the Second Grade Teachers, Art Teachers, Craft Teachers and Physical Education Teachers and others possessing Special B.Ed., Degree qualification.
4. Similarly placed persons have already filed various Writ Petitions and in W.P.No.2937 of 2021, the following directions and observations have been given vide order dated 10.10.2023:
"5. From 17.04.2012, onwards, as per R.C.No. 20201/PG2/ IEDSS/2012, the Resource Teachers were absorbed by the second respondent from such NGOs. The petitioners are imparting education to the physically challenged children with sincerity and passion. Even prior to 01.04.2012, the petitioners were working under NGO who are tasked to implement the scheme and they were paid monthly salary of B.T Scale. Later, they were https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis taken up under the direct control of respondents 2 to 4 as per the proceedings of the Director of School Education vide R.C.20281/PD2/IEDSS/2012 dated 17.04.2013. The petitioners were paid BT Scale of pay to their bank account by ECS directly.
6. After considering the various representations from the Special Teachers across the State seeking absorption and pay regularization, the State of Tamil Nadu has issued a G.O.(Ms).No.28 School Education Department, dated 30.01.2015 for creation of 202 approved posts of special teachers for 2178 special children. The number of posts were identified as per the existing Special Teachers like petitioners under IEDSS Scheme and the number of children were identified as per the number of children beneficiaries as on that date. However, the said G.O.No.28 was not given effect for a long time and the petitioners were not absorbed or regularized. Further respondents 2 to 4 started fresh recruitment process through the Teachers Recruitment Board (TRB) instead of absorbing the services of the petitioners.