Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
The case of Southern Switch Gears Ltd. relied
upon by the ld. AO is distinguishable on facts, because in
the case of Southern Switch Gears both royalty on sales
and lump sum for technical aid was payable in 5 equal
installments, whereas, in the instant case the assessee
neither paid lump sum amount and the payment is
entirely linked to the net sale.
In the instant case the appellant has not acquired
any benefit of enduring nature and it will not constitute
acquisition of any assets. Further by payment of royalty,
the ownership right over trade mark and know how
doesn't transfer to the appellant. The Appellant
Company has a non-exclusive right to use the trademarks
within the territory of India and the royalty is determined
on the basis of percentage of turnover and is not paid as
lump sum, therefore, the same can increase or decrease
on the basis of turnover. It is also pertinent to note that
the above expenditure has not been disallowed by the
department either in the preceding AYs or in the
succeeding AYs.