Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
498.
Further, the facts of the instant case are distinguishable from
those of the Sri Ryaz Ahmed (supra). In that case, the proposed
amendment by the defendant was allowed to be filed as he
wanted to make a counter-claim by way of a decree for grant of
mandatory injunction to remove the built up area on the
disputed portion of land. It was therein held that instead of
driving the defendant to file a separate suit therefor, it was more
appropriate to allow the counter-claim keeping in mind the
prayer of a negative declaration in the plaint. However, in the
instant case, the counter-claim was purported to have been filed
for passing of a decree for recovery of possession of the disputed
land after the suit had been filed.