Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Ticket checking in State vs . Vijay Kumar on 27 September, 2007Matching Fragments
5 PW3 was Hair Ram, who was owner of the said two packages and has deposed that on 25.9.98 he has booked that said two packages of tea Contd..........
/4/ from Assam and has proved the same vide Ex. PW3/A and PW3/B and has further proved the on 31.10.98 he has identified the aforesaid booked package which was stolen vide identification memo Ex. PW3/C 6 PW4 Ct. Daljit Singh and PW6 Ct. Jana Singh are the witnesses of the recovery and both of them have fully supported the case of the complainant . Both the aforesaid witnesses has reiterated the versions as stated by PW2 ASI Gokul Ram Meena and have also proved the document prepared during the investigation as exhibited by PW2 above. Both of them have correctly identified the accused as well as the case property during recording of their statement before the court. 7 PW5 was B.C Sharma , the Parcel Clerk from Tinsukhia Assam and has proved the booking of said packages from Tinsukhia after receiving appropriate fare for the same vide bill No. 373210 and has proved the entry and receipt to this effect Ex. PW3/A and B. 8 PW7 Satpal Singh has deposed that on 4.10.98 he was posted as STE at Delhi (m) on that day he was on duty at Sadar Bazar when he was checking ticket to passengers in train No. DPP2 two persons get down from train , I checked their ticket at platform they were found ticket less and found in possession of two packages booked consignment of railway in the meanwhile ASI Gokul Ram Meena /PW2 alongwith staff reached there and Contd..........