Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

23. The second witness on the point is Hanmant (exhibit 109) who produced two documents (exhibits 111 and 112) which are supposed to be in the handwriting of Krishnaji. Those documents have not been proved to be so. On comparison he was able to say that the handwriting on the disputed documents was that of Krishnaji. That witness was about five or six years old when Krishnaji died, and not being familiar with Modi Script in which Krishnaji's signatures appear on the documents produced by him, his evidence is hardly of any value. Moreover this witness is not much versed in Marathi script, for he is only able to sign his name Upon that evidence it is difficult to conclude that the documents were in fact executed by the coparceners interested in the partition.